Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether M.S. Angles, M.S. Channels, Chequered Plates, H.R. Plates and H.R. Chequered Coil used for erection of factory sheds within the factory qualified as capital goods for the purpose of Cenvat credit under Rule 2(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.
Analysis: The disputed goods were found to have been used in the erection of factory sheds situated within the factory premises. The appellate authority accepted that the goods were utilized in or in relation to manufacture and relied on earlier tribunal authority treating similar goods as eligible for credit. The goods were also treated as immovable items integrated into the factory structure, and no reason was found to disturb that factual and legal conclusion.
Conclusion: The disputed goods were eligible for treatment as capital goods for Cenvat credit purposes, and the revenue's challenge failed.