Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount reimbursed by the assessee-company to its parent-company towards central office administrative expenses was deductible as business expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business and whether it was of a revenue character. The parent-company did not carry on its own trading business and merely rendered services to its subsidiaries, including arranging overdraft facilities, standing surety, advancing funds without interest, and giving technical and business advice. The Tribunal found that the apportionment of the common expenses was fair and reasonable and that the assessee would otherwise have had to incur similar expenditure itself in London. The Court accepted that the expenditure was the assessee-company's contribution towards the cost of services actually rendered for its business, and distinguished authorities dealing with expenditure incurred for the parent-company's own purposes.
Conclusion: The amount was an allowable deduction under section 10(2)(xv) and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A reimbursement of common office expenses paid to a parent-company is deductible where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for the subsidiary's business and is revenue in nature, even though the parent-company is a separate taxable person.