Importability of woollen or synthetic rugs justified unconditional stay relief after the legal position favoured the applicants.

The stay direction requiring pre-deposit of penalty was modified because the subsequent legal position on the importability of woollen or synthetic rugs and the relevant import conditions was entirely in favour of the applicants. In that setting, continued insistence on further pre-deposit was not justified as a condition for maintaining stay. The stay petition was therefore allowed unconditionally.

---

---

Issues: Whether the earlier stay direction requiring pre-deposit of penalty should be modified and the stay petition allowed unconditionally in view of the subsequent legal position on the importability of woollen or synthetic rugs and related import conditions.

Analysis: The case law was found to be entirely in favour of the applicants. In that situation, there was no justification for insisting on further pre-deposit of the penalty as a condition for continuation of the stay.

Outcome: The earlier stay order was modified and the stay petition was allowed unconditionally.

---