Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount paid under the memorandum of understanding, apart from the photocopying and related service charges, was excludible from the assessable value of imported drawings and manuals as consideration for the right to reproduce the imported goods under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988.
Analysis: The valuation question had to be decided strictly under Rule 9(1)(c) and the interpretative note. That provision requires addition of royalties and licence fees related to the imported goods when payable as a condition of sale, but excludes charges for the right to reproduce the imported goods in the country of importation. On the terms of the memorandum of understanding, the consideration was for the supply of technical assistance, documentation, drawings and manuals for upgrading tractor manufacture, and there was nothing to show that any part of the amount represented a separate charge for reproduction rights. The payment to the transmitting agency for photocopies and related services was also distinct from any reproduction right.
Conclusion: The amount in dispute was not excludible as consideration for reproduction rights, and the assessable value was correctly affirmed against the assessee.