TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows duty refund for reconditioned compressor, rules on Excise Act Section 11B</h1> <h3>COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AURANGABAD Versus PRASHANT KHOSLA PNEUMATIC LTD.</h3> COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AURANGABAD Versus PRASHANT KHOSLA PNEUMATIC LTD. - 1995 (78) E.L.T. 70 (Tribunal) The appeal by the Revenue was delayed by more than four months, but the delay was condoned as a question of law was involved. The case involved a compressor sent to a foreign exhibition, returned, reconditioned, and cleared with duty paid. The Collector (Appeals) allowed the refund of duty, which the Revenue appealed. The Tribunal rejected the appeal, stating that erroneous payment of Excise duty can be refunded within the limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, without needing to rely on Rule 173L.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
