Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal affirms classification of instant coffee chicory blend as coffee extract preparation.</h1> <h3>NESTLE INDIA LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH</h3> NESTLE INDIA LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH - 1994 (71) E.L.T. 850 (Tribunal) Issues Involved:1. Classification of the product 'instant coffee chicory blend' under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Classification of the Product 'Instant Coffee Chicory Blend'The primary dispute is the classification of the product 'instant coffee chicory blend' under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants claimed classification under sub-heading 0901.20, while the Department argued for sub-heading 2101.10. Alternatively, the appellants suggested sub-heading 2101.30 or Heading 21.07.Appellants' Argument:The appellants contended that sub-heading 2101.10 is inapplicable as the product is an extract of a coffee chicory mixture, not pure coffee. They argued for classification under sub-heading 0901.20, which covers 'coffee substitutes containing coffee in any proportion,' or alternatively under sub-heading 2101.30 or Heading 21.07, which pertains to 'edible preparations, not elsewhere specified or included.'Relevant Tariff Entries:- 09.01: Coffee, whether or not cured or roasted or decaffeinated; coffee husks and skins; coffee substitutes containing coffee in any proportion.- 0901.20: Coffee substitutes containing coffee in any proportion.- 21.01: Extracts, essences, and concentrates of coffee or tea and preparations with a basis of these products or with a basis of coffee or tea, roasted chicory, and other roasted coffee substitutes, and extracts, essences, and concentrates thereof.- 2101.10: Extracts, essences, and concentrates of coffee and preparations with a basis of these extracts, essences, or concentrates or with a basis of coffee.- 2101.30: Roasted chicory and other roasted coffee substitutes, and extracts, essences, and concentrates thereof.- 21.07: Edible preparations, not elsewhere specified or included.Appellants' Detailed Arguments:The appellants emphasized that the product is a modified coffee blend, not an extract of pure coffee, and should not be classified under sub-heading 2101.10. They referred to various sources, including the KIRK-OTHMER Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology and the Food Adulteration Act, to support their claim that instant coffee chicory blend is distinct from pure coffee. They also cited the case of Brooke Bond India Ltd. v. Union of India, which held that a coffee chicory mixture is a distinct commercial commodity.Department's Counter-Argument:The Department argued that Chapter 9 covers only powder of green coffee seeds, and any extraction of liquor from roasted and ground seeds moves the product to Chapter 21. They contended that the product is not a coffee substitute but a coffee chicory mixture, which should be classified under sub-heading 2101.10. They pointed out that the powder is not directly derived from coffee seeds but through a complex process involving extraction and drying.Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal considered the manufacturing process, which involves blending coffee beans with roasted chicory cubes, extracting liquor, and drying it into powder form, known as instant coffee chicory blend. They concluded that the mixture cannot be classified as 'coffee' under Chapter 9, as it is a distinct commercial commodity known as French Coffee or instant soluble coffee chicory blend.The Tribunal agreed with the Department that the product is not a coffee substitute and thus cannot be classified under sub-heading 0901.20. They noted that sub-heading 2101.10 applies to preparations with a basis of coffee or its extracts, while sub-heading 2101.30 applies to roasted chicory and other roasted coffee substitutes.Since the product is a mixture prepared from coffee-chicory powder and fits the description of preparations with a basis of coffee extract, the Tribunal upheld the Department's classification under sub-heading 2101.10.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and upheld the classification of 'instant coffee chicory blend' under sub-heading 2101.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found