Excise licensing relaxation: timely licence application before the exemption threshold avoided any penalty exposure.

A manufacturer covered by the excise licensing relaxation was required to apply for a Central Excise licence when 80% of the exemption limit was reached. Because the manufacturer applied before crossing that threshold, the duty to suspend manufacture pending actual grant of the licence did not arise. On that factual basis, the record showed no breach of the applicable licensing condition under the exemption notification and the related rules, so penalty was not justified.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty was sustainable where the manufacturer had applied for a Central Excise licence before crossing 80% of the exemption limit under the relevant exemption notification.

Analysis: Section 6 of the Central Excises and Salt Act read with Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 required a manufacturer of excisable goods to obtain a manufacturing licence, but Rule 174A empowered relaxation of licensing control for goods enjoying exemption from duty. Notification No. 111/78-C.E. dated 9-5-1978 required a manufacturer covered by the relaxation to apply for the licence when 80% of the exemption limit was reached. The record showed that the appellant had applied for the licence before crossing that threshold, and therefore the obligation to suspend manufacture pending actual grant of the licence did not arise.

Conclusion: Penalty was not justified, as there was no contravention of the applicable licensing requirement.

---