Classification of circular cellulose nitrate discs denied sheet exemption under the customs tariff and exemption notification.

Cellulose nitrate discs imported in circular form were not treated as sheets under Heading 39.20 because Chapter Note 10 to Chapter 39 confines plates, sheets, film, foil and strip to goods cut into rectangles, including squares, or blocks of regular geometric shape not further worked. The majority found that circular discs do not satisfy that description and instead fall outside the exemption framework limited to cellulose nitrate sheets and films. The HSN explanatory notes were treated as persuasive, and the separate invoicing and pricing of sheets and discs supported their commercial distinction. The goods were therefore classifiable as articles of plastics under Heading 39.26 and not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 226/76-Cus.

---

---

Issues: Whether cellulose nitrate discs imported in circular form were classifiable under Heading 39.20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as sheets so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 226/76-Cus., or whether they were classifiable as articles of plastics under Heading 39.26 and therefore outside the exemption.

Analysis: Chapter Note 10 to Chapter 39 confines the expressions plates, sheets, film, foil and strip to goods cut into rectangles, including squares, and to blocks of regular geometric shape not further worked. The imported goods were circular discs and not rectangular or square sheets. On that basis, the majority held that they did not fall within Heading 39.20 and that the exemption notification, being confined to cellulose nitrate sheets and films falling under Chapter 39, could not extend to the discs. The majority also treated the HSN explanatory notes as persuasive and relied on the separate invoicing and pricing of sheets and discs as supporting commercial distinction.

Conclusion: The discs were not eligible for classification as sheets under Heading 39.20 or for exemption under Notification No. 226/76-Cus., and the departmental view was upheld.

---