Shuttering plywood distinct from structural plywood, so exemption could not be denied on classification assumptions.

Concrete shuttering plywood was not proved to have been manufactured on the available record, because the adverse findings rested on presumption and conjecture rather than acceptable evidence. Shuttering plywood was also treated as distinct from structural plywood in commercial and trade parlance, so it could not be classified as structural plywood for denying exemption under Notification No. 55/79. On that basis, the demand and impugned order were set aside, and consequential relief followed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the appellants manufactured concrete shuttering plywood during the relevant period; (ii) whether shuttering plywood or concrete shuttering plywood could be treated as structural plywood for the purpose of denying the benefit of Notification No. 55/79 dated 1-3-1979.

Issue (i): Whether the appellants manufactured concrete shuttering plywood during the relevant period.

Analysis: The record did not contain acceptable evidence to establish manufacture of concrete shuttering plywood by the appellants. The adverse findings recorded by the authorities below were held to rest on presumption and conjectures rather than proof.

Conclusion: The finding that the appellants manufactured concrete shuttering plywood was not sustained.

Issue (ii): Whether shuttering plywood or concrete shuttering plywood could be treated as structural plywood for the purpose of denying the benefit of Notification No. 55/79 dated 1-3-1979.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that shuttering plywood is distinct from structural plywood in commercial and trade parlance. On that basis, shuttering plywood could not be brought within the category of structural plywood so as to attract higher central excise duty and deny the exemption otherwise available.

Conclusion: Shuttering plywood was not classifiable as structural plywood, and the benefit of the notification was available to the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The demand and the impugned order were set aside, and the assessee obtained consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Classification for exemption purposes must rest on established facts and accepted commercial identity, and goods known in trade as shuttering plywood cannot be treated as structural plywood merely on conjecture or administrative notice.

---