1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court quashes CESTAT decision on Central Excise Act, remands case for fresh adjudication</h1> The Bombay HC quashed CESTAT's decision on Section 11B and the Central Excise Act. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh ... Compounded levy are framed under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - CESTAT holding that the provisions of section 11B do not apply to the scheme of compounded levy - Held that: - Tribunal in its judgment dated 10/04/2006 in the case of Shivagrico Implements Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur reported in 2006 (199) E.L.T. 55 (Tri.-LB) has held that the provisions of Section 11B applies to the scheme of compounded levy - set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the adjudicating authority to decide the question afresh - appeal is disposed off accordingly The Bombay High Court quashed a decision by CESTAT regarding the application of Section 11B to the scheme of compounded levy under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The matter was restored to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs. (Case citation: 2010 (12) TMI 45 - Bombay High Court)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
