1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>CESTAT Chennai Remits Case for Tax Recalculation, Penalties Review</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants, remitting the case to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of ... Payment of Service Tax - Assessee contended that said demand was raised on amount shown as 'receivable' in balance sheet whereas it had already discharged service tax on amount realized. Held that - The question of penal action against the assessees is also to be considered afresh after working out tax liability. The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed by way of remand. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants in contesting a service tax demand of Rs. 59,183. The case is remitted to the adjudicating authority for considering the discrepancy in the amount collected by the assessees and the figure adopted by the department for determining tax liability. Penalties against the assessees are to be reconsidered after calculating the tax liability. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed for remand.