Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a lease deed stipulating a term of nine years with a further period of nine years by way of extension or renewal attracted the deeming provision in the Explanation to Section 269UA(f)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to bring the transaction within Chapter XXC.
Analysis: The Explanation deems a lease to be for not less than twelve years where the lease provides for extension of its term by a further term or terms and the aggregate period is not less than twelve years. The lease deed had to be read as a whole, and Clause 1 expressly stated that the lease was extendable for a further period of nine years at the lessee's option, while Clause 12 also contemplated renewal on specified conditions. On a combined reading, the document showed a provision for extension of the lease term, and the aggregate period exceeded twelve years. The rule of strict construction of penal statutes did not assist the appellants because the issue turned on the true construction of the lease deed, not on giving a narrow meaning to the statutory explanation.
Conclusion: The lease fell within the Explanation to Section 269UA(f)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Chapter XXC was attracted; the contention that the lease was for less than twelve years was rejected.