TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai upholds service tax liability for 'Cable Operator Service,' imposes penalty for suppressing turnover value.</h1> <h3>Micro Vision Cables Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the liability for service tax on 'Cable Operator Service' but set aside penalty under section 76 and imposed ... Penalty - Appellant challenge the penalty u/s 76 and 78. Held that - penalty u/s 76 was to be set aside as section 76 and 78 are mutually exclusive. Since the assessee had not paid service tax on total turnover during relevant period, assessee was guilty of suppression and penalty u/s 78 had rightly been imposed on it. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the liability for service tax on 'Cable Operator Service' but set aside penalty under section 76 and imposed penalty under section 78 for suppressing turnover value. The appeal was partly allowed.
TaxTMI 
