Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether delay in filing should be condoned; (ii) Whether notice should be issued and the matter listed for further consideration.
Issue (i): Whether delay in filing should be condoned.
Analysis: The Court considered the application for condonation of delay and granted relief allowing the petition to proceed despite the delay. The order records the condonation without detailed reasoning.
Conclusion: Delay condoned in favour of permitting the petition to proceed.
Issue (ii): Whether notice should be issued to the opposite party and the matter listed for further consideration.
Analysis: The Court considered submissions on the substantive question (including reference to Section 3(12) of the Customs Tariff Act and related authorities) and directed issuance of notice to the respondent, waived service on respondent No.1, and listed the matter for further consideration on a specified date. Parties were directed to complete pleadings and file a short note of submissions with case law compilation.
Conclusion: Notice issued; service waived on respondent No.1; matter listed for further consideration.
Final Conclusion: The Court has granted interim procedural reliefs (condonation of delay and issuance of notice) and directed further proceedings; no substantive or final adjudication on the fiscal question has been made.