Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment order passed on 31.12.2024 is vitiated by lack of opportunity of personal hearing and ineffective service by uploading notices on the GST portal, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration subject to conditions agreed between the parties.
Analysis: The show cause notice and reminders were uploaded on the GST portal but the petitioner claims lack of awareness and non-receipt of original notice; the respondent admitted that no opportunity of personal hearing was afforded prior to passing the impugned order. Section 169(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 prescribes alternative modes of service; where there is no response to portal notices, the issuing officer ought to have considered other prescribed modes (preferably RPAD) to effectuate service before passing an ex parte assessment. The petitioner has offered to pay 25% of the disputed tax and to file a reply if given opportunity to be heard; the respondent accepted the remand subject to that payment.
Conclusion: The impugned order dated 31.12.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner pays 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks from receipt of this order; on payment the petitioner shall file reply/objection within three weeks and the respondent shall issue a 14 days clear notice fixing date of personal hearing and thereafter decide the matter on merits in accordance with law.