TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Merger of PAN entries and duplicate PAN cancellation: assessment may proceed under Section 148/143(3) regardless of PAN used.</h1> Merger of PAN entries and cancellation of duplicate PAN is addressed; the revenue may proceed with reassessment under income tax law (reopening and ... Merger of PAN entries - cancellation of duplicate PAN - petitioner has stated that the Assessing Officer(AO) is harassing him unnecessarily and had issued a notice u/s 142(1) asking him to furnish return different from PAN using and filing his returns under - petitioner submitted that since the petitioner has not been using the PAN against which demand raised he cannot file return as directed by the Assessing Officer - HELD THAT:- In view of the assertion so made in the application, we allow the Assessing Officer to proceed with the assessment proceedings under Section 148/143(3) of the Act of 1961 against the petitioner, irrespective of either of the PAN numbers given in any transaction. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. It is hereby made clear that henceforth, the petitioner shall not be allowed to raise any objection in relation to the proceedings initiated by the respondents-Department against the petitioner irrespective of the PAN number. It shall also be required of the Assessing Officer or the Authority issuing the PAN number, to forthwith cancel petitioner’s second PAN. Issues: (i) Whether the Assessing Officer may proceed with assessment/reassessment proceedings under Section 148/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the taxpayer irrespective of differing PAN numbers recorded in transactions; (ii) Whether the Authority should be directed to cancel a PAN number not in use and whether the taxpayer should be precluded from raising objections in relation to proceedings initiated irrespective of PAN.Issue (i): Whether the Assessing Officer may proceed with assessment/reassessment proceedings under Section 148/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the taxpayer irrespective of differing PAN numbers recorded in transactions.Analysis: The Court considered the petitioner's contention that notices issued in respect of a PAN not used by him led to harassment and his request to merge PAN numbers. The Court recorded the petitioner's concession that any addition found in respect of the other PAN may be made in his assessment and permitted the Assessing Officer to continue assessment or reassessment proceedings under Section 148/143(3) without being constrained by the particular PAN quoted in transactions.Conclusion: The Assessing Officer is permitted to proceed with assessment/reassessment under Section 148/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the taxpayer irrespective of the PAN number quoted in transactions. This conclusion is against the taxpayer's challenge and in favour of the Revenue.Issue (ii): Whether the Authority should be directed to cancel a PAN number not in use and whether the taxpayer should be precluded from raising objections in relation to proceedings initiated irrespective of PAN.Analysis: The Court directed that the unused PAN shall be cancelled by the Authority issuing PANs and recorded that henceforth the taxpayer will not be permitted to raise objections to proceedings initiated by the Department irrespective of the PAN number. The Court also left open a route for the Department to seek clarification or recall if any grievance remains.Conclusion: The Authority is directed to cancel the unused PAN forthwith and the taxpayer is precluded from raising objections in relation to proceedings initiated by the Department irrespective of PAN. This conclusion is in favour of the Revenue.Final Conclusion: The interim application is disposed of by permitting continuation of assessment/reassessment proceedings regardless of PAN discrepancies and directing cancellation of the unused PAN; the connected writ petition is disposed of in light of these directions.Ratio Decidendi: Where duplicate or differing PAN entries exist, the tax authority may proceed with assessment or reassessment under Sections 148 and 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 against the taxpayer irrespective of the particular PAN quoted, and the Authority may cancel an unused PAN to prevent procedural multiplicity.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
