Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Assessment under Section 144B set aside for denial of hearing; remitted for fresh assessment after full hearing</h1> Assessment under Section 144B was set aside for breach of the principles of natural justice because the taxpayers request for a scheduled video hearing ... Assessment u/s 144B - denial of the opportunity of a hearing - breach of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- Admittedly, in the facts of the present case, this request was made, and the video conference was scheduled for 25th March 2025. Despite this, the impugned assessment order was passed prior thereto, namely on 17th March 2025. For all these reasons, as mentioned earlier, the impugned Assessment Order cannot stand and is unsustainable. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned Assessment Order and all notices issued pursuant thereto. The assessment is now restored to the file of the Assessing Officer at the stage of the Show Cause Notice dated 7th February 2025. The Assessing Officer is directed to consider the reply filed by the Petitioner, and thereafter, deal with the requests made by the Petitioner to provide copies of the replies received u/s 133(6) of the IT Act, and also the request to invoke the provisions of Section 144A. Assessing Officer shall pass a speaking order after fully hearing the petitioner. Issues: Whether the assessment order passed on 17th March 2025, before the scheduled video-conference hearing on 25th March 2025 and despite a request for personal hearing, is vitiated for breach of principles of natural justice and Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis: Section 144B(6)(vii) permits an assessee or authorised representative to request a personal hearing where variation is proposed, and Section 144B(6)(viii) requires that such hearing be allowed and conducted exclusively through video conferencing or video telephony. The facts establish that a request for a video-conference personal hearing was made by the assessee and that the hearing had been scheduled for 25th March 2025. The assessment order impugned was passed on 17th March 2025 prior to the scheduled hearing date. Given the statutory entitlement to a personal hearing on request and the pre-scheduled date for such hearing, the impugned order was issued without affording the procedure mandated by Section 144B and without providing the opportunity to make oral submissions; consequently the order and consequential notices are procedurally unsustainable. The matter is remitted to the Assessing Officer at the stage of the Show Cause Notice dated 7th February 2025 for reconsideration, including providing copies of replies under Section 133(6) and considering invocation of Section 144A, and for passing a speaking order after fully hearing the assessee through the proper video-conference mechanism.Conclusion: The impugned Assessment Order dated 17th March 2025 and all notices issued pursuant thereto are set aside; the matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer to consider the assessee's replies and requests and to pass a speaking order after affording the requested video-conference personal hearing. This conclusion is in favour of the assessee.