Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Deduction under section 80-IA based on profits from eligible business, not limited to income solely from that business.

        COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus TRIDOSS LABORATORIES LTD.

        COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus TRIDOSS LABORATORIES LTD. - [2010] 328 ITR 448 (Bom) Issues:
        1. Interpretation of section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction eligibility.
        2. Determining the gross total income and its relation to deduction under section 80-IA.
        3. Application of legal principles from Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer of Income-tax [2002] 254 ITR 608.

        Issue 1: Interpretation of section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deduction eligibility:
        The Revenue raised questions regarding the computation of profit from an eligible unit under section 80-IA. The primary concern was whether the deduction should be permissible to the assessee under section 80-IA if the income is equivalent to or more than the profit of the eligible unit. The court analyzed the provisions of section 80-IA, emphasizing that the deduction is allowed based on the profits and gains derived from the eligible business for ten consecutive assessment years. The court highlighted that the total income includes all income from any source derived, as per section 5(1) of the Act. It was concluded that there is no basis in the provisions of section 80-IA to restrict the total income to only that derived from an eligible business.

        Issue 2: Determining the gross total income and its relation to deduction under section 80-IA:
        In this case, the Assessing Officer computed the gross total income of the assessee at Rs. 14,57,200, while the profit of the eligible unit was Rs. 98.43 lakhs. The Tribunal directed that the deduction should be restricted to the extent of the gross total income, as it was less than the eligible profit of the unit. The court referred to the definition of gross total income under section 80B(5) and highlighted that the deduction under section 80-IA is based on profits derived from the eligible business. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to limit the deduction to the gross total income, in line with the provisions of the Act.

        Issue 3: Application of legal principles from Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer of Income-tax [2002] 254 ITR 608:
        The court referenced the Synco Industries case, where it was established that gross total income should be determined by setting off business losses before allowing deductions under Chapter VI-A. If the resultant income is nil, then the deduction cannot be claimed. In the present case, the Tribunal restricted the deduction to the extent of the gross total income after setting off losses from other sources. This decision was deemed consistent with the Act's provisions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law.

        Overall, the judgment clarified the interpretation of section 80-IA, emphasized the calculation of gross total income for deduction eligibility, and applied legal principles from relevant precedents to determine the outcome of the case.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found