Penalties under sections 271D and 271E overturned where foundational additions were deleted; penalties deleted and appeals dismissed.

Penalties under sections 271D and 271E were challenged on the basis that the additions forming the basis for penalty were deleted; where the assessment additions are deleted, the foundational satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order ceases to exist, rendering penalty proceedings unsustainable. The requirement that satisfaction regarding alleged breach of restrictions on cash transactions be recorded in the assessment order is essential for valid initiation of penalty proceedings; annulment or setting aside of that assessment removes the statutory foundation and led to deletion of the impugned penalties and dismissal of the Revenue appeals.

---

---

Issues: Whether deletion of the assessment additions by the first appellate authority (and confirmation thereof) eliminates the foundation for penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the learned CIT(Appeals) erred in deleting those penalties.

Analysis: The penalties under sections 271D and 271E were levied solely on the basis of additions treated as unexplained money under section 69A. The additions which formed the basis for initiation and imposition of the penalties were deleted by the first appellate authority and that deletion was subsequently confirmed. Under the applicable legal framework, a penalty imposed as consequential to assessment additions lacks a sustaining foundation once those additions are set aside. The requirement that the Assessing Officer record satisfaction regarding contraventions of sections 269SS and 269T in the assessment order is central to validly initiating penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E; annulment or reversal of the assessment order removes that recorded satisfaction and consequently undermines the penalty proceedings. Established precedent supports that deletion of the underlying additions removes the basis for sustaining consequential penalties.

Conclusion: The deletion of the underlying assessment additions removes the basis for penalties under sections 271D and 271E; the learned appellate authority did not err in deleting the impugned penalties. The appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed.

---