Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether IA No. 1010/CHE/2022, filed under Section 71 of the IBC seeking initiation of prosecution and punishment, is free from procedural impediment of non-impleadment and must be decided independently on merits by the NCLT in view of the subsequent impleadment order dated 29.07.2025.
Analysis: The Appellate Tribunal examined the three interlocutory applications (IA No. 1010/2022, IA No. 1234/2022 and IA No. 1242/2024) together and identified that IA No. 1010/2022 sought punishment under Section 71 of the IBC for alleged falsification of corporate debtor records. IA No. 1234/2022 sought impleadment of the erstwhile Resolution Professional and the new Liquidator into IA No. 1010/2022. The NCLT's subsequent order dated 29.07.2025 impleaded those persons into IA No. 1010/2022, thereby removing the procedural obstacle that earlier affected consideration of IA No. 1010/2022. Given the removal of the impediment, the Tribunal concluded that IA No. 1010/2022 must now be considered on its own merits by the NCLT without being influenced by the Appellate Tribunal's observations in the present order.
Conclusion: In favour of Appellant. The appeal is disposed of to the limited extent that IA No. 1010/CHE/2022 is to be decided by the NCLT, Chennai, independently on merits now that impleadment has been effected and the procedural impediment no longer survives.