Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Special Leave Petition challenging the Adjudicating Authority's order closing the liquidation process of the corporate debtor and taking the Liquidator's final report on record should be considered on merits.
Analysis: The Adjudicating Authority recorded that the liquidator conducted the liquidation and related processes in accordance with the Code and the Liquidation Process Regulations, including public announcement, valuation, e-auction sale of the company as a going concern, realization and distribution of sale proceeds in accordance with Section 53, filing of the liquidation account showing zero balance, issuance of sale certificate, and handover of management. The Adjudicating Authority directed service on the Registrar of Companies and discharged the liquidator subject to procedural compliances. A corrigendum clarified that, because the corporate debtor was sold as a going concern, the liquidation process may be closed. Having taken note of those orders and the recorded compliance with the Code and Regulations, the Court found no reason to consider the petition on merits.
Conclusion: The Special Leave Petition is disposed of and the Adjudicating Authority's order closing the liquidation process is left undisturbed, resulting in an outcome in favour of the Respondent.