Service tax not leviable on statutory charges, tender-related fees and compensatory recoveries treated as non-service consideration.

Service tax was held unsustainable on payments made for police security, vendor registration, tender cost and inspection charges, because the police charges related to a statutory function, the inspection charges were integral to distribution activity, and the registration and tender amounts were part of the bidding process rather than consideration for any service. Amounts recovered for pre-term resignation or breach of tender conditions were treated as compensatory receipts, not payment for tolerating an act or situation. Following settled precedent and the applicable departmental circular, the demand for service tax, interest and penalty was set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether service tax, interest and penalty were sustainable on the amounts paid to the State Police Department for security services, on vendor registration charges, tender cost and inspection charges, and on amounts recovered as penalty for non-fulfilment of tender conditions.

Analysis: The demand was covered by the same issues already decided in the appellant's earlier appeal, where the Tribunal had held that the police charges were collected for discharge of a statutory function and were not taxable as business support or security agency services in the hands of the service recipient. It had also held that meter inspection charges were linked to the distribution activity and not separately taxable, while vendor registration charges and tender cost were part of the bidding process and not consideration for any service. As regards amounts recovered for pre-term resignation and breach of tender conditions, the earlier order held that such receipts were compensatory in nature and not consideration for tolerating an act or situation. Following that decision for the subsequent period, no different view was called for.

Conclusion: The entire demand of service tax, interest and penalty was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order could not be sustained, with consequential relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Amounts recovered for discharge of statutory functions, for activities integral to the assessee's own operations, or as compensation for breach or non-fulfilment of contractual conditions do not constitute taxable consideration for service, and a demand contrary to a binding departmental circular and settled precedent is unsustainable.

---