2026 (1) TMI 388 - AT - Central Excise

Interest on refunded pre-deposit in s. 11B refund appeal rejected, as s. 35FF interest claim required separate proceedings

The dominant issue was whether interest on a pre-deposit, allegedly refunded without interest, could be granted in an appeal arising from a refund claim ... Interest on amount sanctioned as refund to the appellant from the date of deposit of the amount by the appellant to the date the amount was refunded to the appellant - HELD THAT:- From the submissions advanced by the learned senior counsel for the appellant, it transpires that this pre-deposit amount was paid to the appellant. The only contention is that interest was not paid. If interest was not paid it was for the appellant to have pursued separate appropriate proceedings and this claim for interest cannot be examined in these proceedings which emanate from the application filed by the appellant under section 11B of the Central Excise Act. This application does not refer to refund of the amount of pre-deposit or payment of interest on it under section 35FF of the Central Excise Act. This issue, therefore, cannot be examined in this appeal. There is, therefore, no merit in this appeal - It is, accordingly, dismissed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED 1. Whether interest was payable on the refunded amount under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when the refund sanctioned under section 11B was granted within three months from the date of receipt of the refund application. 2. Whether a claim for interest on refunded pre-deposit under section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be examined in an appeal arising from a refund application made only under section 11B, where the application did not seek refund/interest of pre-deposit and the dispute before the authorities related to section 11BB interest on the section 11B refund. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue 1: Interest on section 11B refund under section 11BB Legal framework: The Court considered section 11B (refund application for duty and interest paid) and section 11BB (interest on delayed refunds), which makes interest payable only if the refund ordered under section 11B is not refunded within three months from the date of receipt of the section 11B(1) application. Interpretation and reasoning: The Court treated the refund as one pursued and processed strictly under section 11B, as the refund application itself expressly stated it was filed under section 11B pursuant to the Tribunal's earlier directions. On the statutory scheme, section 11BB interest is attracted only upon delay beyond the three-month period computed from the date of receipt of the refund application. Since the refund application was filed on 26.09.2019 and the refund was sanctioned on 18.10.2019, the refund was granted within three months. Consequently, the statutory condition for section 11BB interest was not met. The Court also found no error in the reasoning of the authorities who denied interest on this basis. Conclusions: Interest under section 11BB was held not payable because the refund was sanctioned within three months of the section 11B application; the rejection of the interest claim by the authorities was upheld. Issue 2: Entertaining section 35FF interest claim on pre-deposit within section 11B refund appeal Interpretation and reasoning: The Court noted that the appeal before it arose from a refund application under section 11B for a specified refunded amount and that the application did not refer to refund of pre-deposit or interest on pre-deposit under section 35FF. It further recorded that the pre-deposit itself had already been refunded and only interest was said to remain unpaid. The Court held that if interest on pre-deposit was not paid, the appellant was required to pursue separate appropriate proceedings, because the claim could not be examined within the present proceedings emanating solely from the section 11B refund application and the section 11BB interest dispute. Conclusions: The Court held that the section 35FF pre-deposit interest contention was not examinable in the present appeal and must be pursued separately, as it did not arise from the section 11B refund application under consideration.