Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultTMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Interest claim on bank-held sanctioned refund amid unjust enrichment dispute; denied while refund must go to Consumer Welfare Fund.</h1> Interest on the sanctioned refund amount kept in a bank was sought. The Tribunal held that entitlement to interest is contingent on the substantive ... Denial of interest accruing on the amount of refund sanctioned that was deposited in the bank - principles of unjust enrichment - whether the amount of refund that was sanctioned has to be paid to the appellant or deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund had earlier been decided by the Commissioner holding that it would have to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund? - HELD THAT:- The present appeal has been filed against that part of the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) refusing to grant interest to the appellant on the amount of Rs.9,69,12,799/- deposited in the bank pursuant to the order by the Rajasthan High Court. Grant of interest to the appellant would depend on whether it is the appellant which has to receive the refund amount or the amount has to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund. At the moment there is an order of the Commissioner against the appellant and unless that order is set aside and an order is passed that the amount has to be paid to the appellant, interest cannot be paid to the appellant. It is therefore not necessary to keep this appeal pending any longer. It is for the appellant to take appropriate steps for getting a decision on the issue as to whether the principle amount of Rs.9,69,12,799/- has to be refunded to the appellant or it has to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund. The appellant can get interest only if it is held that the refund amount has to be paid to the appellant. Appeal disposed off. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED 1. Whether the appellant is presently entitled to interest on the refund amount that was deposited in a nationalized bank pursuant to court directions, when the substantive entitlement to receive the principal refund amount (as against credit to the Consumer Welfare Fund on the ground of unjust enrichment) has not attained finality. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue 1: Entitlement to interest on the bank-deposited refund amount pending final determination of refund entitlement Legal framework (as discussed by the Tribunal): The Tribunal treated the grant of interest as consequential and dependent on the determination of who is legally entitled to the principal amount-either the claimant as refund or the Consumer Welfare Fund due to unjust enrichment. The Tribunal relied on the existence and effect of operative adjudicatory orders regarding unjust enrichment and refund entitlement, rather than independently adjudicating interest in isolation. Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal noted that the principal question-whether the amount earlier sanctioned but kept aside is payable to the appellant or must be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund-had not attained finality because the appellant's challenge to the later decision was earlier disposed of with liberty to revive after the final verdict of the High Court. The Tribunal further observed that, at present, there exists an order of the Commissioner holding against the appellant on unjust enrichment and directing credit of the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. On this footing, the Tribunal held that interest cannot be granted to the appellant unless and until that adverse determination is set aside and it is held that the refund amount is payable to the appellant. Since interest is contingent on a final finding that the appellant is entitled to the principal refund, deciding interest now would be premature. Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the appeal seeking interest need not be kept pending. It disposed of the appeal, holding that the appellant can receive interest only if it is ultimately held that the refund amount is payable to the appellant, and that the appellant must first take steps to obtain a decision on whether the principal amount is refundable to it or is to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found