Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was denied the opportunity of personal hearing under the Faceless Appeal Scheme, 2021, warranting restoration of the appeal for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The assessee had requested a personal hearing through the faceless appellate channel, and the scheme contemplates that such a request, when made, is to be allowed and the hearing conducted through video conferencing or video telephony to the extent technologically feasible. Since the request was not granted, the appellate order was found to have been passed without affording the assessee an effective opportunity to explain its case. In these circumstances, the appropriate course was to set aside the impugned order and restore the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration after granting personal hearing.
Conclusion: The denial of personal hearing was held to justify remand, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.