Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the restriction of the addition on account of bogus purchases by estimating the net profit rate at 2.5% was justified.
Analysis: The assessment had treated the purchases as bogus and made a full addition, but the first appellate authority found that the assessee had already suffered tax on the profit element embedded in the corresponding sales. The appellate authority therefore estimated the profit element by considering the past net profit trend and enhanced the net profit rate on the impugned purchases to 2.5% from 1.89%. On scrutiny of the record, no infirmity was found in that approach.
Conclusion: The restriction of the addition was upheld and the Revenue's challenge failed.