Drawback classification for knitted garments and delayed sanction interest turn on shipping-bill descriptions and departmental proof.

Exported knitted readymade garments described in the shipping bills were treated as classifiable under a single drawback entry in Chapter 61 where the department failed to conduct verification or give reasoned support for multiple sub-headings; the bulk of the goods was therefore classified under CTH 6102 with drawback at 10% of FOB value subject to the prescribed per-piece cap, while the separate classification for wind cheaters under CTH 6110 was left undisturbed. Delay in conversion of the shipping bills and sanction of drawback, not wholly attributable to the exporter, attracted interest on the delayed drawback amount from the legally relevant dates, reflecting the principle that unjustified retention of money due carries interest.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the exported knitted readymade garments were classifiable under a single tariff heading for drawback purposes, and whether the drawback rate had to be fixed accordingly; (ii) whether the appellant was entitled to interest on the drawback amount for delay in conversion of the shipping bills and sanction of drawback.

Issue (i): Whether the exported knitted readymade garments were classifiable under a single tariff heading for drawback purposes, and whether the drawback rate had to be fixed accordingly.

Analysis: The description in the shipping bills showed that the goods were knitted readymade garments such as shirts, dresses, coats and blouses. No test or verification had been conducted by the department to justify classification under multiple sub-headings, and no specific reasoning supported the impugned classifications. The relevant drawback entry for ready-made garments under Chapter 61 covered the goods described in the shipping bills, and the record did not support the alternative classifications adopted for most of the shipments. The Tribunal, however, accepted the classification of the wind cheaters under the separate heading found applicable by the adjudicating authority.

Conclusion: The goods covered by shipping bill serial numbers 1 to 32 were held classifiable under CTH 6102 with drawback at 10% of FOB value subject to a maximum of Rs. 45 per piece, while the classification and drawback fixed for shipping bill serial numbers 33 and 34 under CTH 6110 were upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the appellant was entitled to interest on the drawback amount for delay in conversion of the shipping bills and sanction of drawback.

Analysis: The delay in conversion could not be wholly attributed to the appellant, as the matter had remained pending through earlier proceedings and the department eventually allowed conversion on the same material already furnished. For the eight shipping bills earlier covered by the Tribunal's order dated 16.10.2001, the conversion was treated as effective from that date. For the remaining shipping bills, the relevant delay was held to run from three months after the rejection order dated 17.10.2018, since the rejection was later set aside and conversion was ultimately allowed on the same facts. Applying the principle that unjustified retention of money due attracts interest, the Tribunal held the appellant entitled to interest on the delayed drawback.

Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to interest at 6% on the drawback amount for the eight shipping bills covered by the earlier Tribunal order from three months after 16.10.2001 until sanction, and for the remaining shipping bills from three months after 17.10.2018 until sanction.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded in part on classification and interest, with the principal drawback claim recalculated for the bulk of the goods and interest awarded for the period of administrative delay.

Ratio Decidendi: Where exported goods are identifiable from the shipping-bill descriptions and the department does not establish a contrary classification by verification or reasoned analysis, drawback must be determined on the correct tariff entry; unjustified delay in conversion or sanction of drawback attracts interest from the legally relevant date when the exporter is not at fault.

---