Refusal to intervene in challenge to GST Department seizure under Section 67 of CGST Act left undisturbed SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC's refusal to intervene in proceedings challenging GST Department's seizure alleged to contravene ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Refusal to intervene in challenge to GST Department seizure under Section 67 of CGST Act left undisturbed
SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC's refusal to intervene in proceedings challenging GST Department's seizure alleged to contravene Section 67 of the CGST Act, 2017. The HC found no grounds to disturb the impugned order, and SC agreed there was no reason to interfere, leaving the High Court's decision intact.
1. Delay condoned. 2. "Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and having gone through the materials on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court." 3. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.