Appeals dismissed for inordinate delay; no condonation; appeals under Sections 143(3)/153C not admitted on facts SLPs dismissed by SC for inordinate delay and absence of a plausible, bona fide explanation; condonation of delay refused. The Court declined to admit ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeals dismissed for inordinate delay; no condonation; appeals under Sections 143(3)/153C not admitted on facts
SLPs dismissed by SC for inordinate delay and absence of a plausible, bona fide explanation; condonation of delay refused. The Court declined to admit appeals against HC orders entertaining appeals from ITAT decisions under Sections 143(3)/153C on the present facts. SC left open the substantive legal question on maintainability of HC appeals versus ITAT orders to be decided in an appropriate case, without expressing a view on its merits.
There is an "inordinate delay" in filing three Special Leave Petitions: 245 days, 156 days, and 408 days respectively. The Court found no "plausible and Bonafide explanation" to condone the delay. The Special Leave Petitions are "dismissed on the ground of delay." The Court expressly kept the substantive "question of law" raised by the Additional Solicitor General open for determination "in an appropriate case." All pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
