Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Customs appeal was maintainable when the aggregate of redemption fine and penalty was below the monetary threshold limit fixed by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.
Analysis: The value involved was found to be much below the threshold limit. The confiscation and penalty imposed by the original authority had already been set aside by the Tribunal, and the High Court had declined interference. In that setting, the aggregate of redemption fine and penalty being below Rs. 1,00,00,000, the appeal was treated as not maintainable.
Conclusion: The challenge to the High Court order was rejected and the appeal was held to be not maintainable because the monetary threshold was not met.