Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of employees' contribution towards provident fund and ESI, said to have been deposited after the due date under the respective welfare statutes but before the due date for filing the return under section 139(1), could be sustained, and whether the matter required verification of the due date for the relevant provident fund payment.
Analysis: The issue was treated as settled against the assessee by the Supreme Court decision in Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. However, the relevant due date under the provident fund law was directed to be verified before making the disallowance, and the Assessing Officer was asked to decide the matter afresh after giving the assessee reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The disallowance was not finally deleted or sustained at this stage, and the matter was sent back for verification and fresh decision.