Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order remanding the matter for fresh determination of the taxable value of dyes, colours and chemicals transferred in the course of job work under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act could be sustained.
Analysis: The earlier Division Bench decision had held that chemicals used in job work are taxable, but the extent of tax depends on the quantity of dyes, colours and chemicals actually transferred or retained in the fabric. The matter was therefore remitted to the Assessing Officer to undertake a factual enquiry, permit the parties to adduce evidence, and determine the value of the consumables embedded in the textile in accordance with law. That decision was thereafter carried in appeal to the Supreme Court, which declined interference and dismissed the appeals, leaving all contentions open before the Assessing Officer. In view of that binding outcome, the present appeal raised no surviving question against the Tribunal's remand order.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's remand order was correctly upheld and the appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The legal position on taxability of consumables used in textile job work stood settled against the appellant, and the assessment had to proceed on the basis of factual determination of the quantity actually transferred.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the taxability of consumables in job work turns on the extent of goods actually transferred, the Assessing Officer must determine the factual quantity embedded or retained, and a remand for that purpose is sustainable when supported by binding precedent.