Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and liable for interest under section 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax at source under section 194C on payment of External Development Charges to HUDA.
Analysis: The payment of External Development Charges to HUDA was held to attract the provisions governing deduction of tax at source. The order under challenge had followed the binding jurisdictional High Court decision holding that such payments by real estate developers to HUDA fall within section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, failure to deduct tax at source justified treating the assessee as an assessee in default and levy of consequential interest.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue; the assessee was rightly treated as an assessee in default and was liable to interest under section 201(1A).
Ratio Decidendi: Payment of External Development Charges to HUDA by a real estate developer attracts deduction of tax at source under section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and non-deduction renders the payer an assessee in default under section 201(1), with consequential liability to interest under section 201(1A).