TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC rejects petition for 337-day delay under Section 337, no fraud or bias found against IT Settlement Commission</h1> <h3>THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 MUMBAI Versus JAGDISH BHAGWANDAS AHUJA & ORS.</h3> The SC dismissed the petition due to a 337-day delay in filing, refusing to condone the delay. There was no allegation of fraud, malice, or bias against ... Order passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) - delayed filling of SLP - As decided by HC [2024 (4) TMI 1291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] no allegation in the petition of any fraud or malice or bias against the settlement commission - HELD THAT:- After hearing learned senior counsel for the petitioner, we see no reason to condone the inordinate delay of 337 days in filing the present petition. The application for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition is also dismissed. The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and K. Vinod Chandran, dismissed the application for condonation of a 337-day delay in filing the petition, stating, 'we see no reason to condone the inordinate delay.' Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was also dismissed, and any pending applications were closed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
