TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Supreme Court, with Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale presiding, condoned a delay of 323 days in filing the petition, allowing I.A. No. 160389/2025. The petitioners challenged the High Court's condonation of delay in entertaining the writ petition. However, relying on the findings in paragraphs 4 to 6 of the impugned judgment, the Court held that the High Court did not err in condoning the delay. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and disposed of any pending applications.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
