TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court dismisses tax petitions with 322 and 358 day delays regarding Sections 153C and 148 assessment notices</h1> The SC dismissed Special Leave Petitions filed with gross delays of 322 and 358 days respectively, which were not satisfactorily explained by petitioner. ... Reopening of assessment v/s assessment u/s 153C - Applicability of Sections 153C and 148 of the Act in case of seizure of material in search or requisition of books-documents relating to assessee other than on whom the search was conducted or requisitioned made - Delay in filling SLP HC decided [2024 (4) TMI 196 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] If the Department has chosen not to proceed u/s 153C, no right is created to the petitioner for getting the notice u/s 148 quashed. Moreover, learned Single Judge was not having the benefit of the decision of Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd. [2023 (4) TMI 1056 - SUPREME COURT] . The appeal against the order was dismissed having rendered infructuous in view of the subsequent developments that the assessment order was passed. The decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Saloni Prakash Kumar [2023 (10) TMI 207 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] is of no help to the respondents. The High Court held that Section 153C does not preclude issuance of notice u/s 148. The field of applicability of two sections was not the issue before the Court. The notices issued u/s 148 and the impugned orders are quashed. HELD THAT:- There is a gross delay of 322 and 358 days respectively in filing the Special Leave Petitions which has not been satisfactorily explained by the petitioner. Even otherwise, we find no good reason to interfere with the common impugned order passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay as well as merits. However, the question of law is kept open. The Supreme Court, through Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, dismissed the Special Leave Petitions due to a 'gross delay of 322 and 358 days' in filing, which was 'not satisfactorily explained' by the petitioner. Additionally, the Court found 'no good reason to interfere with the common impugned order passed by the High Court.' The petitions were dismissed 'on the ground of delay as well as merits,' but the 'question of law is kept open.' Pending applications were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
