TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court issues notice challenging GST registration treatment under Section 25(4) Central GST Act distinct person provision</h1> <h3>UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Versus M/s B BRAUN MEDICAL INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS.</h3> The SC issued notice in a case where the petitioner challenged an HC decision regarding GST registration treatment. The petitioner argued that the HC ... Treatment as a distinct person - submission is that the High Court has completely ignored Section 25(4) of the Central GST Act which categorically states that each registration shall be treated as distinct person for the purposes of this Act - HELD THAT:- Issue notice, returnable within six weeks. The Supreme Court, through Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale, addressed a petition wherein the Additional Solicitor General contended that the High Court erred by disregarding Section 25(4) of the Central GST Act. This provision 'categorically states that each registration shall be treated as distinct person for the purposes of this Act.' The Court issued notice with a returnable period of six weeks.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
