TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court rejects revenue appeal filed 1027 days late without proper justification on service tax demands</h1> The SC dismissed the revenue's appeal due to a delay of 1027 days in filing without sufficient explanation. The CESTAT had set aside demands for service ... Condonation of delay of 1027 days in filing the appeal - sufficient reasons for delay or not - The CESTAT in its order set aside the demand of service on liquidated damages/penalty collected for non-compliance of the terms of the contracts - Appellant had agreed to tolerate breach of timelines stipulated in the contract - HELD THAT:- There is a reported delay of 1027 days in filing the appeal of there is no sufficient explanation. The appeal of revenue dismissed on the ground of delay. The Supreme Court, per Hon'ble Justices Manoj Misra and Ujjal Bhuyan, dismissed the appeal due to an unexplained delay of 1027 days in filing. The Court held that 'there is no sufficient explanation' for the delay, warranting dismissal on this ground. Consequently, all pending applications stand disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
