1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Assessee gets fresh opportunity to substantiate case on section 68 addition after appeals restored for de novo proceedings</h1> The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the appeals for statistical purposes after the assessee's representative requested another opportunity to substantiate their ... Addition u/s 68 - AR stated that the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case before lower authorities if granted another opportunity of hearing - HELD THAT:- We deem it fit to afford another opportunity of hearing to the assessee to substantiate its case before Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, the impugned orders, for both the years, are set aside and the appeals are restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its case - Appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes. Summary:In the twin appeals for AY 2010-11 and AY 2011-12, the assessee challenged additions made u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A), who did not consider documents filed during first appeal. The assessee sought another opportunity to substantiate its case, citing the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision in Munjal BCU Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship vs. CIT (CWP-21028-2023 (O&M) dated 04-03-2024. The ITAT held that 'it is fit to afford another opportunity of hearing to the assessee' and accordingly set aside the impugned orders and restored the appeals to the file of the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication on merits. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.