Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand order under the GST regime was liable to be set aside for non-issuance of notice under Section 142(1)(A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the relevant pre-amendment assessment period.
Analysis: The petitioner faced a demand order arising from proceedings for reversal of input tax credit, tax, interest and penalty. The challenge was founded, inter alia, on absence of the notice contemplated by Section 142(1)(A) before commencement of the assessment proceedings. The Court noted that it was not disputed that no such notice had been served prior to the assessment proceedings and followed its earlier decisions holding that, for periods prior to the amendment of Section 142(1)(A), absence of the prescribed notice vitiates the assessment process.
Conclusion: The demand order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for fresh assessment in accordance with the GST law and rules.