TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of alleged unexplained investment from unsecured loans and the consequential application of section 115BBE required interference, or whether the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The assessee produced material relating to the lenders, repayment of loans in subsequent years, and other supporting documents. The additional material placed before the first appellate authority was not forwarded to the Assessing Officer for verification or remand report. In view of the record, the issue could not be finally adjudicated on the existing material and required reconsideration by the Assessing Officer after giving a proper opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after affording adequate opportunity to the assessee.
TaxTMI 
