Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal was wrongly rejected as time-barred and whether the matter required remand for decision on merits.
Analysis: The Order-in-Original was served on the petitioner on 9 March 2023 and the appeal was filed on 29 March 2023. On those facts, the appeal was within limitation. The rejection of the appeal solely on the ground of limitation was therefore unsustainable. The challenge regarding levy of service tax on a practising advocate was not decided and was left for consideration by the Appellate Authority.
Conclusion: The impugned appellate order rejecting the appeal as barred by limitation was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on its own merits in accordance with law.