Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether input tax credit could be claimed notwithstanding the filing of the return under Section 39 beyond the time prescribed, and whether the Covid-19 related extension or the subsequent insertion of Section 16(5) enlarged the relevant period for the tax period 2020-21.
Analysis: The return for the relevant tax period was filed after the statutory deadline under Section 16(4). Although the Covid-19 period had led to extension of limitation in certain proceedings, the later insertion of Section 16(5) showed that the legislature consciously addressed the filing period under Section 39 and did not extend it beyond 30 November 2021 for 2020-21. The constitutional validity of the provision was not challenged, and the Court found no basis to read in a further extension.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to input tax credit on the basis of the belated return, and the challenge failed.