Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (6) TMI 1913 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Co-operative bank wins appeal for section 80P(2)(d) deduction on interest from surplus fund deposits with scheduled banks The Tribunal allowed the co-operative bank's appeal, ruling it was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Co-operative bank wins appeal for section 80P(2)(d) deduction on interest from surplus fund deposits with scheduled banks

                            The Tribunal allowed the co-operative bank's appeal, ruling it was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on deposits made with scheduled banks from surplus funds. The Tribunal distinguished the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars' case, noting that unlike situations where interest belongs to individual members, here the surplus funds had already become the bank's profits. Following precedents from Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh HCs, the Tribunal held that interest income from surplus fund deposits retains its character as banking business income, maintaining nexus with principal business operations and qualifying for statutory deduction.




                            1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                            The core legal questions considered in this appeal are:

                            • Whether the assessee, a co-operative bank, is entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and/or section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act in respect of interest income earned on deposits made with scheduled banks.
                            • Whether the deposits made by the assessee from surplus funds affect the entitlement to deduction under the said provisions.
                            • The applicability and interpretation of relevant judicial precedents concerning the nexus between interest income earned on deposits and the principal business income of a co-operative society/bank.

                            2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                            Issue 1: Entitlement to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and/or 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act on interest income earned on deposits with scheduled banks

                            Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 80P of the Income Tax Act provides for deductions to co-operative societies in respect of income derived from certain specified sources. Sub-section (2)(a)(i) and (2)(d) specifically deal with income from banking business and interest on securities or deposits, respectively. The key legal question is whether interest income earned on deposits made by the co-operative bank out of its surplus funds qualifies for deduction under these provisions.

                            Judicial precedents relevant to this issue include the judgment of the jurisdictional High Court in Sahyadri Cooperative Credit Society Ltd., where the Court distinguished the Supreme Court decision in M/s. The Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Limited. The High Court observed that in The Totgars' case, interest income earned on surplus receipts that were due to individual members was rightly treated as income from other sources because it lacked nexus with the principal income of the society. However, in the present context, the investment was made from amounts that had already attained the character of surplus profits in the hands of the assessee, thereby maintaining the nexus with the principal business.

                            Additionally, the High Court's approach was supported by decisions of the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka High Courts in The Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Ltd. and Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Limited, which upheld the view that interest income on deposits made from surplus funds of co-operative banks retains its character as income from banking business and is therefore eligible for deduction under section 80P.

                            The Tribunal in a recent decision involving a similar issue (Thrissur District Electricity Board Employees Co-op Society Limited) also followed the Sahyadri Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. verdict, reinforcing the principle that interest income earned on deposits made from surplus funds is deductible under section 80P.

                            Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction on the ground that the deposits were made from surplus funds, thereby severing the nexus between the interest income and the principal business income. However, the Tribunal found this reasoning untenable in light of the binding judicial precedents.

                            The Tribunal emphasized that the interest income earned on deposits from surplus funds of the co-operative bank continues to be integrally related to the business of the bank and hence qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal distinguished the facts from The Totgars' case, underscoring that the surplus funds in the instant case had already attained the character of profits of the assessee, and the interest income derived therefrom cannot be treated as income from other sources.

                            Key evidence and findings: The factual record established that the assessee is a co-operative bank which earned interest income from deposits placed with scheduled banks. The Assessing Officer's disallowance was premised on the assertion that the deposits were from surplus funds, but there was no material to show that such interest income lacked connection with the banking business.

                            Application of law to facts: Applying the principles laid down in the Sahyadri Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. judgment and other allied decisions, the Tribunal found that the interest income earned on deposits made from surplus funds retained its character as income from banking business. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

                            Treatment of competing arguments: The Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) took the view that the interest income was not eligible for deduction because it was earned on deposits from surplus funds, which allegedly broke the nexus with the principal business income. The Tribunal rejected this argument, relying on judicial precedents that clarified the distinction between interest income that rightfully belongs to the society and that which accrues to individual members. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)'s partial allowance insufficient and allowed the appeal fully.

                            Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest income earned on deposits made from surplus funds. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

                            3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                            The Tribunal's crucial legal reasoning is encapsulated in the following verbatim excerpt from its decision in a similar case:

                            "'We also find force in the submission of the learned Senior counsel, distinguishing the decision of the Supreme Court in M/s. The Totgars' Cooperative Sale Society Limited (supra), on the ground that the Court in that case had found that the Society concerned had appropriated amounts forming part of surplus receipts which were due to its members, and invested the same to earn interest during the period when the surplus receipts were in its hands. It was therefore that the court found that the interest earned by the Society through deposit of such receipts with banks in fact ought to have accrued to the benefit of the individual members and not to the Society itself; that in relation to the Society, it was to be treated as income from other sources since the interest income had lost its nexus with the principal income earned by the Society. The facts in the instant cases are entirely different and the investment concerned was of amounts that had already attained the character of surplus profits in the hands of the assessee. On this issue, therefore, we find ourselves in agreement with the view taken by the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka High Courts respectively in The Vavveru Cooperative Rural Bank Ltd. (supra) and Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Limited (supra).'"

                            The core principles established are:

                            • Interest income earned by a co-operative bank on deposits made from surplus profits retains its character as income from the banking business.
                            • Such interest income is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
                            • The nexus between the interest income and the principal business income is not severed merely because the deposits are made from surplus funds.
                            • The distinction drawn by the Supreme Court in The Totgars' case applies only where the interest income accrues to individual members and not to the society itself.

                            Final determination on the issue was that the assessee's appeal is allowed, reversing the disallowance of deduction under section 80P in respect of interest income on deposits.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found