Cenvat Credit on flexographic plates as capital goods cannot be denied once the balance becomes admissible next year.

Flexographic plates used in a printing machine were treated as components of the flexographic printing machine and therefore as capital goods under Rule 2(A)(iii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. For capital goods, only 50% credit is available in the year of receipt, with the balance becoming admissible in the next financial year under Rule 4(2)(a). Because the disputed credit had become admissible by the time the show cause notice was issued, recovery under Rule 14 was not in accordance with law. The denial of Cenvat credit was therefore not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the credit.

---

---

Issues: Whether flexographic plates used in the printing machine were capital goods under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and whether denial and recovery of the remaining 50% Cenvat credit under Rule 14 could be sustained when that credit had become admissible in the next financial year by the time the show cause notice was issued.

Analysis: Flexographic plates were treated as components of the flexographic printing machine and thus as capital goods under Rule 2(A)(iii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. For capital goods, only 50% credit is available in the year of receipt, with the balance becoming admissible in the next financial year under Rule 4(2)(a). The disputed credit related to earlier months and, by the time the show cause notice was issued, the balance credit had already become admissible. In that situation, invocation of Rule 14 to deny and recover the credit was not in accordance with law.

Conclusion: The denial of Cenvat credit was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the credit.

---