TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Rejects Petition Challenging High Court Order, Upholds Original Decision Despite Delay Condonation</h1> <h3>VALLEY IRON AND STEEL COMPANY LIMITED Versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL - I</h3> SC partially dismissed the petition challenging a HC order. Despite counsel's arguments, the court condoned delay but refused to intervene in the original ... Addition u/s 68 - AO doubted the genuineness of the loan transaction and hence added the amount to the income of the appellant/assessee - loan agreement is titled “unsecured term loan agreement” - as decided by HC [2024 (1) TMI 218 - DELHI HIGH COURT] initial onus was not discharged by the appellant/assessee. Besides this, the argument advanced that since there was remission of liability Section 41(1) of the Act would apply and not the provisions of Section 68 as rightly held by the Tribunal, is an untenable submission. Since the genuineness of the loan transaction was doubted, no liability, in law, fructified requiring remission HELD THAT:- After hearing for the petitioner, we are not inclined to interfere with the order impugned passed by the High Court. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court, in a partial bench comprising Hon'ble Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Augustine George Masih, after hearing counsel for the petitioner, 'condoned delay' but declined to interfere with the impugned High Court order. The petition was 'dismissed,' and all pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
