Corroborated section 50 statements can justify attachment where investigative material links property to proceeds of crime.

Statements recorded under section 50 of the Act, when corroborated by seizure material, investigative records and surrounding circumstances, can provide a prima facie basis for confirming attachment of properties alleged to be derived from proceeds of crime. The Tribunal found material showing illegal coal excavation, theft and transportation, and relied on statements indicating participation in the illegal activity, receipt of proceeds of crime, and layering through shell companies and accommodation entries. It also noted a chartered accountant's admission regarding dummy entities and found no credible explanation for the source of funds used for the acquisitions. On that basis, the challenge to the provisional attachment failed and the confirmation of attachment was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the provisional attachment confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority was liable to be set aside on the ground that the appellant's involvement in the alleged money laundering activity was not established and that the attachment rested only on statements recorded under section 50 of the Act.

Analysis: The record disclosed material showing illegal coal excavation, theft and transportation, together with recovery and seizure of coal and supporting investigative material. The statements recorded under section 50 of the Act, including the statement of the principal accused and the appellant, indicated the appellant's participation in the illegal activity, receipt of proceeds of crime, and use of shell companies and accommodation entries to layer the funds. The statement of the chartered accountant admitting receipt of substantial amounts for creating dummy entities, together with the seized documents and other corroborative material, supported the finding that the properties were acquired out of proceeds of crime. The Tribunal also found no credible explanation for the source of funds used for the acquisitions.

Conclusion: The attachment was held to be justified and no illegality was found in the confirmation of the provisional attachment.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the attachment failed, and the orders under appeal were sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Statements recorded under section 50 of the Act, when corroborated by investigative material and surrounding circumstances, can furnish a prima facie basis for confirming attachment of properties believed to be derived from proceeds of crime.

---