Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 74 and the appellate order deserved interference for want of a proper opportunity of hearing under Section 75(4).
Analysis: The impugned orders were found to prima facie disclose no effective opportunity of hearing. Since an opportunity of hearing is mandatory under Section 75(4), and the issue was covered by the cited precedent, the orders could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The assessment order and the appellate order were quashed for breach of the mandatory hearing requirement.
Final Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for a fresh decision after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute mandates an opportunity of hearing before finalisation of proceedings, an order passed without compliance is unsustainable and liable to be quashed and remanded for fresh adjudication.