Assessment limitation and lawful transfer of jurisdiction required; orders set aside and matter remitted for fresh assessment.

An assessment made after disposal of writ proceedings must comply with the prescribed six-month period counted from the date the order reached the departmental authority; where the record does not justify delay beyond that limit, the assessment is unsustainable on limitation. A transfer of the assessee's assessing jurisdiction must also be supported by material showing the lawful basis of the change; in the absence of such record, the reassignment of authority is unjustified and the assessment cannot stand. The impugned appellate and assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after disclosure of the jurisdictional transfer records.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the assessment order was barred by limitation under the statutory time framework applicable after disposal of the writ proceedings. (ii) Whether the assessment order could be sustained when the record did not show lawful transfer of the assessee's assessing authority from one jurisdiction to another.

Issue (i): Whether the assessment order was barred by limitation under the statutory time framework applicable after disposal of the writ proceedings.

Analysis: The period after the writ petition was disposed of had to be computed on the basis of the date when the order reached the departmental authority, and the assessment was required to be made within the prescribed six-month period. The record did not justify the delay in passing the assessment order beyond that period.

Conclusion: The assessment order was not sustainable on the ground of limitation.

Issue (ii): Whether the assessment order could be sustained when the record did not show lawful transfer of the assessee's assessing authority from one jurisdiction to another.

Analysis: The original assessing authority was shown to be one office, while the assessment order was passed by another office. No material was brought on record to show the order or basis by which jurisdiction was transferred. In the absence of such material, the change of assessing authority was held to be unjustified.

Conclusion: The assessment order was unsustainable for want of proof of lawful transfer of jurisdiction.

Final Conclusion: The impugned appellate and assessment orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for a fresh assessment in accordance with law after due disclosure of the jurisdictional transfer records.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory period for passing an assessment has expired after exclusion of the relevant stay period, and the record does not establish a lawful transfer of assessing jurisdiction, the assessment order cannot be sustained and the matter may be remanded for fresh decision.

---