Review maintainability under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC turns on binding precedent, not a later contrary view.

Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC was applied to clarify that a later reversal or modification of legal view in another case, by itself, is not a ground for review. The prior co-equal three-Judge Bench decision was treated as binding, and the later order relied upon was noted not to have considered that earlier authority. On that basis, liberty to seek review was declined and the review petition was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether liberty to seek review could be granted in view of a later decision and whether the review petition was maintainable.

Analysis: The order relied on the Explanation to Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which makes it clear that a later reversal or modification of a legal view in another case is not, by itself, a ground for review. The Court also treated the prior co-equal three-Judge Bench decision as binding and held that the later order relied upon had not noticed that earlier decision.

Conclusion: Liberty to seek review was declined and the review petition was dismissed.

---